30 June 2003

At Last, the "Liberal Media" Has Been Found!

You've all heard me say over and over that the myth of the liberal media (and particularly any liberal media conspiracy -- oh, that's funny! How I wish!) is as dead as Strom Thurmond -- and that was before he actually passed on (and now that his body is back in the capital building, I have to ask -- how can they tell he's actually dead?).

So imagine my chagrin when I discover a hotbed of liberal media bias in exactly the last place I would have thought to look -- the Army Times, the newspaper of our largest and currently most in-danger armed forces.

They seem to think our current President is full of shit, and says one thing while doing another.

Fancy that.

Here, read it yourself. Quick, because it's likely to get pulled.

Update: Son of a bitch, they did pull it. Here's an alternate link, courtesy of Daily Kos. Let freedom blog!

29 June 2003

Don't Take My Word for it ...

... take the word of the (London) Guardian, a truth-speaking paper if ever there was one.

The gap between the rich and poor in America is fast growing into a chasm. Latest figures show that just 400 Americans collectively had an income of $70bn. According to America's Internal Revenue Service, in nine years the incomes of the top few hundred taxpayers increased at 15 times the rate of the bottom 90% of Americans.

How interesting that our own media has chosen not to report these statistics. Liberal media my ass.

To join the very richest taxpayers in the US in 1992 required an average income of $46.8m. In 2000, it was was almost $174m. The average income for nine-tenths of all Americans, by comparison, rose in the same period by 17% to $27,000. Of course all this happened during the dot.com boom of the Clinton years. But the Bush White House has not stemmed the rise of the rich. Instead it has accelerated their ascent.

President Bush's tax cuts are heavily skewed towards rewarding the wealthy - arguing that handing back money to the most successful American wealth creators will create more wealth for America. This analysis, known as trickle down economics, is frankly nonsense. The rich and powerful historically prefer not to save and invest. They tend to spend on consumption - mansions, luxuries, fast cars and yachts. What savings the overly compensated do have are held for trading purposes in assets, not investment in capital for production.

Nobody would want to decry affluence -- but wasteful, conspicuous spending has few civic virtues. America, a country with no comprehensive healthcare system, is now a place where record numbers of high earners do not pay any income tax at all.

Again -- you didn't read that in any American journal, did you?

No amount of corporate scandals or outrageous tax wheezes designed to avoid coughing up seems to bother the political class. This may be because the very poorest sections of society in America, like much of the western world, are less likely to vote. But US politicians should care. If a tiny fraction of society takes an ever-larger slice of a nation's wealth that leaves less for everyone else.

More at the link above. Makes you think, doesn't it?

26 June 2003

Watch This ... BOMB!

Microsoft spends about ten times what Apple does on R&D.

Apple earlier this week showed off a fair chunk of what they've spent their money on ... the fastest personal computer in the world, the first 64-bit modern desktop computer, an incredible new way to organise one's desktop, audio/video conferencing for the rest of us, and by far the best MP3 player and multimedia software the world knows.

Microsoft also just showed off a fair chunk of what they've shot their R&D wad on ... a watch that makes you pay a $10/month subscription fee.

While I will be the first to admit that a watch that can convert from analog to digital display is kinda neat-o, and I'll even confess than some of the other theoretical features like traffic reports, directions, news summaries and weather/temperature info are kinda cool ... then comes the moment I remember that this is supposed to happen on a watch with a visual screen 1/3rd the size of your average cellphone (or about 1/8th the size of a PDA screen, aka "a postage stamp"), and that I'm expected to pay $10/month for this. Then I come back down to earth and have a good, hearty laugh at Microsoft's expense.

I can see John Cameron Swayze now ... "Microsoft's Q Watch. It takes a licking and keeps on ... oops."

Bum: "Hey buddy, what time is it?"
Man: "I don't know, I have a virus."

Microsoft ... helping you spot the idiots since 1995.

Introducing ...

My new favourite song.

Strom Thurmond, Lester Maddox: Now As Dead As Their Philosophies

Editorial note: I have edited this piece since it first appeared in light of the deaths of Lester Maddox and Maynard Jackson.

People who know me will tell you I do not like to be mean-spirited. I classify myself as an optimist, and even those people with whom I strongly disagree about almost everything, I find I can get along with them in most cases -- and I try to find and capitalise on what I see as the good in them.

This is a bit of a challenge when you are talking about a couple of good ol' boy segregationists like Strom Thurmond and Lester Maddox, but I'll give it a go nonetheless.

In a strange kind of way, I can see where Strom and Lester were coming from most of their lives. Perhaps that's because I grew up around a lot of Southerners though I feel quite detached from them, or maybe it was the timing of my life, growing up as I did in the heart of the civil rights movement both in time (the mid-to-late 60s) and location (mostly Atlanta, Alabama and North Carolina).

Through my mother, I met and knew some of the notable figures of the Civil Rights movement; I knew Lester Maddox quite well, and we frequently socialised with him at his (second) Atlanta restaurant, the Pickerick. When he was diagnosed with brain cancer in the late 70s and closed his restaurant, we naturally assume that would be pretty much the story on him, but as he did all his life, he outfoxed us all; he went to the Bahamas for some experiemental and presumably illegal sheep-brains-injection treatment and miraculously recovered (and lived another quarter-century, as it turned out).

There's not much to say about Lester Maddox that can't be looked up in a history book. Like Thurmond and others of that ilk, you may not like their views but you could be damn sure you were getting the real, unfiltered man when you talked to him. Maybe that's why I strangely miss these guys -- they were the last of the honest-and-proud-of-it politicians. No waffling with these guys, though ironically they both "waffled" on the biggest position of their lives -- but they did so honestly and humbly, like Alabama Governor George Wallace. Their version of "remorse" for their segregationist past may have been pretenious and condescending, but it was all they knew how to do and they came by it sincerely, not via their finely-honed senses of opportunism.

If I had to put one word to the life and mind of Lester Maddox, that word would be "crafty." When he was in the thick of the civil-rights struggle he balanced his position with the will of the public by declaring that he would serve blacks at his (original) Pickrick restaurant -- if they came in on a unicycle with an pickaxe handle balanced on their heads (a trick he could do). And when some of them did, he kept to his word and served them as honoured guests with not a hint of prejudice. It may have been a strange sort of chivalry, but at least he had some.

When the tide turned and his outlook was put out to pasture, Maddox spent his requisite time "in the wilderness" and returned with a sincerely-changed heart. I had my doubts when I first met him, but he won me over. That's not to say that he ever really understood blacks or the black experience, but he did grasp the injustice he had doled out and he was sorry he had done so. When he opened his second restaurant, if he came up to a black family's table and asked them how it was and they said "it was just Pickericking," he would pick up the entire tab, or so the story goes. He used to autograph pickaxe handles and got rich serving fried chicken and watermelon (of all things). After his reformation he was careful to treat his black employees and customers fairly, and he won a lot of goodwill in the process -- a real-life Grinch story, in a way.

Thinking about Maddox and his passing reminded me of the important people of that era who has also touched my life. Again through my mother, I met and got to know Jimmy Carter and his family (she was friends with "Miss Lillian"; Alabama Governor George Wallace; Colonel Harland Sanders of KFC fame (she turned down jobs caring for both of them). I have in my life also met (briefly or socially) MLK compatriots such as former Atlanta Mayors Andrew Young and Maynard Jackson, Dr. Ralph Abernathy, Julien Bond and Rev. Hosea Williams. When I was a teen, I even appeared in a film about the assassination of Medgar Evers -- playing a junior Klansman! So in a funny way, whenever one of these figures dies -- regardless of which side of the race debate they were on -- I feel a small part of myself dies with them.

From the time I was very young, I've always felt that I was as close as a white guy could be to "colour-blind" when it comes to race. I certainly have my prejudices (everybody does, don't kid yourself), but I try to apply them to people's behaviour or intelligence or lifestyle rather than their skin colour. So, for example, I'm much more likely to sneer at some poor white trailer trash than I am a working-but-poor black family. Some would say (and I might agree) that this sort of prejudice isn't any better than racial prejudice. So I work on it, and I try always to remember that even the dumbest, hickest, most racist, fascist, homophobic sports-loving fatso sonofabitch probably has some knowledge, insight or skill that I do not possess and could benefit from.

So far, I've not been able to rid myself of all prejudices -- but as I get older I find that I am slowly but steadily improving on my humility, which makes up for a lot of those prejudicial weaknesses IMHO.

Strom Thurmond is one of the few people I came to really hate on an individual level, for a number of reasons -- he was one of those rare breed of men who not only fed on racial hatred, thrived on it, but was proud of it. And though in the public's eyes he may have "reformed" with the times and learned to accept black people, I've met too many of those old-time good ol' boy racists to be fooled -- Thurmond learned to tolerate blacks, but (not so) secretly, he never accepted them as equal with whites.

But the reason I came to loathe him was not really his fault per se -- it was misdirected anger at the people of South Carolina who kept re-electing the man at least 25 years beyond the time he really could do them any good. Even in his prime, he was a backwards, knee-jerk, furriner-hatin', mean-spirited bastard of a conservative congressman (and that was before he became a Republican!) and he only got worse as the 70s ended.

But then he became a doddering, manipulated tool of the far-right lunatic wing of the GOP. And the voters let him do that. Shame on him, and shame on them. If you're going to elect a conversative Senator, go ahead -- but at least elect one that can make his own decisions.

On the other hand, there's no denying that Strom Thurmond saw -- and was part of -- an awful lot of American history. Leno-esque lame jokes about how he only just missed the signing of the Constitution aside, Strom Thurmond was in Congress for 48 years, from 1954 on. He was a political enemy of Harry Truman, single-handedly opened the South up for the Republicans to creep in (a malady that grows worse with each passing day), and served in political office through five major wars and ten presidents. He was alive when the Wright Brothers flew their plane at Kitty Hawk, not far from where he grew up. I'm sorry, but you just have to admire that.

Thus, as a piece of living history, I'm sorry he's gone. And despite my strong disagreement with his views, I'm sorry his 100th birthday party was ruined by that ass Trent Lott. I would have loved to have met Strom Thurmond and asked him about his life, about how a solidly progressive FDR Democrat turned into a far-right conservative, about the tragedy of the loss of his first wife, about becoming a father again at such an advanced age (oops, turns out he fathered a black baby in his youth! OMG, what a frickin' hypocrite!). Mostly I wish I could have asked him about all the incredible sights he had seen in his life, but of course the time for that was probably at least 20 years ago if not more. His aides operated him like a puppet the for at least the last 10 years of his Senate career.

In many ways I feel like I got some insight into Strom's worldview by knowing Lester Maddox reasonably well. They really were two examples of a breed of Southerner that is now (at last!) passing into memory. That civil rights figure and exact opposite Maynard Jackson should happen to pass away the same week would probably be considered "uppity" by them if they were around to comment. :)

I was in Atlanta when Maynard Jackson became the first-ever black mayor. Though I was too young to fully appreciate his first term's accomplishments, I got two other chances -- he was re-elected twice, skipped a couple terms on behalf of his pal Andrew Young, and returned for a final term in 1990.

What Jackson will be primarily remembered for is his aggressive use of his office to dismantle the good-ole-boy network of city government contracting. He insisted on helping black-owned businesses get some of the pork that Atlanta handed out, even in partnership with white-owned businesses, and thus introduced a model of affirmative action in government hiring that has gone on to become the de-facto standard of government contract-awarding today. And though the current system still has problems and abuses, it opened the door for a lot of successful black- and minority-owned businesses to succeed. The black, hispanic and single-female middle class in this country owes a lot to Maynard Jackson.

What I remember most about him is that he was a larger-than-life figure (over 300 pounds most of his adult life) who was both extraordinarily positive and happy, and an untiring advocate for Atlanta and her people (of all races). He was absolutely convinced that Atlanta was the best city on earth, full of the finest people -- and this from a man who was in office during two of Atlanta's darkest moments: the child-killing spree of Wayne Williams, and the bombing of the Atlanta Olympics (he was instrumental in having brought the Olympics to Atlanta during his final term of office). His belief in Atlanta as a underrated major metropolis was infectious, and helped bring the major airport, Olympic renovations and a significant raising of Atlanta's status as the major hub and capitol of the South to it.

Love em or hate em, all three of these men played major roles in shaping the destiny of America in the 20th century. Few among us will ever get that kind of opportunity. Their loss is -- without question -- bittersweet.

Supreme Court: Good and Bad

Today marked a big decision on the part of the Supreme Court, and the good news is that they acted firmly and surprisingly brazenly to both revoke their previous poor judgment on privacy in this country, and to sweep away the backwards laws that suggested homosexuality is a crime.

This is an enormous victory not just for gay people, who should long ago have been fully recognised as law-abiding citizens, but also for heterosexual people. Fascists and pinheads have always portrayed the sodomy laws as applying only to homosexuals, but they most certainly do not.

Here in Florida, our sodomy laws are so strict that oral and anal sex -- even among consenting, married heterosexual couples -- is illegal. In some states (coughTEXAScoughGEORGIAcough), any sex act other than the missionary position is forbidden by law. The sodomy laws are so stupid and silly that even Justice Clarence Thomas, a right-wing homophobe if ever there was one, recognised them as ridiculous -- even though he still wanted to uphold their constitutionality.

So the good news is that America now has better privacy laws, and gays have a strong footing for obtaining their full legal rights which have for far too long been denied them.

The bad news is that it is now obvious (as if it wasn't already) that at least two Supreme Court justices are not only vicious, evil, religious conservative Republican partisans, they are certifiably insane. (and yes -- there's a difference :)

Chief Justice William "homosexuality=beastiality, incest and child molestation" Rehnquist and Justice Antonin "homosexuals should be hunted down and imprisoned, if not killed outright" Scalia both wrote in their dissenting opinions that the Court had bought into "the homosexual agenda" (a concept as non-existant as "the liberal media") and that the Court had taken the wrong side in "the culture war."

Say what??

Tell me, Justices ... what do the aliens who kidnapped and probed you think of all this?

16 June 2003

Bush War Lies #8

Just in case you're still hanging on to the shred of hope that some snippet of what George Bush has been telling us about Iraq, here I think is the straw that will break the camel's back.

A thorough British analysis now shows that the "mobile biological weapons labs" that both Bush and Blair have claimed are proof of WMDs ... are not mobile biological weapons labs, "nor could they be." They are, exactly as the Iraqis have claimed all along, mobile hydrogen labs for anti-artillary balloons.

Well over 200 sites have been completely searched, most of the top Iraqi officials and scientists have now been captured and interviewed, and any leads provided by locals has been long since exhausted -- so much so that the unit first sent to search for these weapons is now on paid time off.

As appalled as I am that no WMDs have been found despite very specific claims as to their nature and location, I am even more appalled that the conservative media giants now ask people in poll questions "does it matter if we find WMDs or not?"

Does it matter???

Does it matter if we went to war for no reason? Does it matter if the President and his administration lied to Congress, to the American public and to the world? Does it matter if hundreds of soldiers from various countries (not counting Iraq) died for nothing? Does it matter if thousands of Iraqi civilians and soldiers died for nothing?

Does it matter??? Sheesh.

Are we saying that it's okay to lie to the people if you are a Republican talking about leading our nation into war and exposing us all to increased danger from terrorism, but not if you're a Democrat trying to hush up an embarrassing and sordid affair? Or are we saying that it's okay to put the lives of our troops at great risk through deception, but bad to get a blowjob while you're in office?

Next time you wonder why our kids turn out so stupid and ethically challenged as to provide never-ending fodder for the Jerry Springers of this world, try re-reading the above mixed messages.

14 June 2003

The ABBA Generation

My esteemed friend and colleague Liz Langley has summed up the opposition movement to Bush with another sparkling example of her brilliant wit. I guarantee that after reading this piece, you'll be humming ABBA songs all day ... and liking it!

Bush War Lies #7

The CIA knew Bush was lying in his State of the Union address.

They knew that Rumsfeld was lying about WMDs.

Colin Powell knew and continues to know that he lied to the UN and to the public about the imminent danger of Iraq. He knows that the CIA was manipulated into making vague statements when they knew full well that the "intelligence" was false.

Remember back when the President lied about a blowjob? Remember what a big deal we all thought that was?

Happy Birthday to Anarchy in the AM!

(Sheepish look)

Uh ... I was just looking over the archives and realised that I started this blog on April 27th, 2002 -- or about 13.5 months ago. Totally missed the anniversary.

That's okay, though. Unlike OTHER anniversaries, the blog doesn't stop sleeping with you if you forget. :)

07 June 2003

I Come To You Now ... at the Turning of the Tide!

CNN wonders aloud if lying about the reasons for the war is an impeachable offense.

Well, DUH.

"The public was told that Saddam posed an imminent threat," argued New York Times columnist Paul Krugman in a recent editorial. "If that claim was fraudulent, the selling of the war is arguably the worst scandal in American political history -- worse than Watergate, worse than Iran-contra."

Well, DUH.

Here's a wonderfully dry excerpt from the CNN article, written by former Nixon counsel John Dean (who knows a Presidential scandal when he sees one):
In an apparent attempt to bolster the President's credibility, and his own, Secretary Rumsfeld himself has now called for a Defense Department investigation into what went wrong with the pre-war intelligence. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd finds this effort about on par with O.J.'s looking for his wife's killer.


Dean even quotes Senator Bob Graham, one of the most honest and likeable Democrats in the entire world: "there's been a pattern of manipulation by this administration."

Well, DUH.

It's gotten so big that even the major newspapers cannot play patsy to the President anymore. The Dallas Morning News, the Salt Lake Tribune and the Denver Post have now all called for Attorney General John Ashcroft to step down -- both in light of the aggregious abuses of the original Patriot Act, the blistering report on the third-world treatment of innocent detainees after September 11th (yes I said innocent -- guilty of illegal immigration, perhaps, but not one of them has been charged with any terrorism-related crime), and his chutzpah for wanting to strip all citizens of our Constitutionally-protected civil liberties even further than he already has.

More later. Much more later. This is just the tip of the freakin' iceberg.

Oh, and to those who are tired of the focus this blog has recently taken on political views of late: get your own damn blog. Stop living in your fantasy world and wake up -- you've been lied to, and you've had your freedoms stolen from you, and you were too busy gassing up your Hummer to make the 1.4 mile trip to the Wal-Mart to grab your Tivo so you can't miss an episode of American Idol to notice. Veterans in particular should be ashamed of the way they've slept on the job.

Bush War Lies #6

And now, finally, the truth begins to come out:

The US Defense Department admits that its intelligence agency said there was no reliable information about possible chemical weapons in Iraq.

NO RELIABLE INFORMATION.

Somebody lied, and those somebodies are Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. And George Bush. And Colin "This is Bullshit" Powell. And Condy Rice. And this creepy Wolfowitz character who suddenly seems to be in charge. And Ari "Even I Can't Keep a Straight Face" Fleisher.

Oh, and let's not forget the hilarity of Don Snow's outrageous claims that huge deficits combined with favour-the-rich tax cuts are a great idea.

Indeed, is there anyone at the top level of this administration who isn't a sociopathic, habitual liar?? Anybody??

Dammit, I want at least the same level of Congressional investigation and witch-hunting as Clinton got. That was one guy lying about a blowjob. This is an entire administration with a disturbing agenda and absolutely no ethics whatsoever. Since you were going to send a note to your congressperson anyway (about the FCC ignoring the wishes of the public and giving away our airwaves, remember?), throw in a note about how you demand hearings. Subpoenas. Convictions and resignations.

03 June 2003

Bush War Lies #5

"Immigrants detained in the wake of the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks were kept in 'unduly harsh' conditions, prevented from seeing their lawyers and abused mentall and physically" -- San Jose Mercury News

Dramatic claims by President Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell and other top officials that Iraq was hiding vast stocks of banned weapons so far have proved to be without foundation ... CIA chief George Tenet resisted insistent pressure from some quarters -- particularly the Pentagon -- to shape intelligence estimates on Iraq to provide backing for the war ... Pentagon civilians, supported by Vice President Cheney's office and some officials on the National Security Council staff, were pushing more alarmist views. -- San Jose Mercury News

When all three major US newsweeklies - Time, Newsweek and US News & World Report - run major features on the same day on possible government lying, you can bet you have the makings of a major scandal. -- Asia Times

The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) formally concluded that "there is no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons" in September 2002, just as Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld was telling Congress that the Baghdad "regime has amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of chemical weapons, including VX, sarin, cyclosarin and mustard gas ... At one point during the rehearsal [for the UN presentation], the normally mild-mannered Powell tossed several pages in the air. "I'm not reading this," he declared. "This is bullshit." -- US News and World Report

01 June 2003

Bush War Lies #4

Bush, Blair did not do proper research - Taipei Times (Taiwan)

"The suggestion that there was a risk of chemical or biological weapons being weaponised and threatening us in a short time was spin." -- Sunday Telegraph (UK)

"The charge of deception [by Rumsfeld] is inescapable," Allge-meine Zeitung (Frankfurt, Germany)

"The greatest lie told by statesmen in recent years," Le Monde (Paris)

More here.

Bush War Lies #3

Lessee, what do we have today? Yes, there's fresh evidence coming fast and furious (or should that be 2Fast 2Furious?) these days that when it comes to Presidential Credibility, Bush seems determined to one-up the previous champion of Executive Untruth, Bill Clinton.

Today, we discover that Australia's spys knew -- and informed the government -- that the United States was lying about Iraq's WMD status. Gosh, why are we the last to know? Oh yeah, because we're being manipulated. Doh!

(tip o the hat to Bob Harris at Tom Tomorrow's This Modern World for the heads-up).

But if you're still holding on tenaciously to your misguided belief that Dubya is at least "basically a good man," well what can I say but gawd bless ya, you're the naive and deluded salt of the earth and I wouldn't have it any other way. But there is a handy-dandy test of Bush's true agenda coming up, if you're interested ...

As we've seen, longtime fugative and mad bomber Eric Rudolph was finally captured. Now, if we are to believe the government on this one, this man bombed abortion clinics and killed people (including police officers), bombed gay clubs and killed people, and bombed the Atlanta Olympics and injured lots of people (killed one, but not directly), then evaded justice and has apparently been breaking the law ever since by living as a burglar.

Sounds like he deserves at least the death penalty to me. But given that this particular mad bomber is a pro-life, anti-gay mad bomber who's agenda is in lockstep with the current Attorney General, let's just see how aggressively the Justice Dept. pursues this case, shall we?